If your employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a possibility to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may well allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is generally only accomplished if the employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence along with the petitioner company responded into the allegations therefore they were nicely aware about the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to be appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
A lessen court might not rule against a binding precedent, although it feels that it really is unjust; it could only express the hope that a higher court or the legislature will reform the rule in question. In case the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and desires to evade it and help the regulation evolve, it may well either hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts with the cases; some jurisdictions allow for a judge to recommend that an appeal be carried out.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252214 Tag:Primarily, this is really a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; if the parents with the boy or girl never approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they will do if they are able to Reduce off social relations with the son or perhaps the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this kind of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male that's a major, the couple is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who gives these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against these types of persons and further stern action is taken against this kind of person(s) as provided by legislation.
Normally, the burden rests with litigants to appeal rulings (like Individuals in distinct violation of recognized case law) to the higher courts. If a judge acts against precedent, as well as case just isn't appealed, the decision will stand.
Unfortunately, that was not real. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son told his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two times later, and admitted to having sexually molested the few’s son several times.
However it is made obvious that police is free to choose action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject matter to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused for the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also be certain respect on the family get rid of in accordance with regulation and should they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they can act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall secure concrete evidence and obtain necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate like a issue of security with the house is concerned, which will not be public place under the Act 1977. nine. Looking at the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition has been obtained. Therefore, this petition is hereby disposed of during the terms stated above. Read more
PLR is often a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
11 . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is a free and democratic place, and once a person becomes a get more info major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents of the boy or Lady will not approve of these kinds of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they could do if they are able to Slash off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nevertheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or male who is a major, the few is neither harassed by everyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to process by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against such person(s) as provided by law.
Summaries offer concise insights into the legal principles governing agreements between parties, including the formation, interpretation, and enforceability of contracts, furnishing a useful resource for understanding contractual rights and obligations.
five hundred,000/- (Rupees 5 hundred thousand only) Just about every plus the same shall be retained inside the police station into the effect that no harm shall be caused to your petitioners. 5. In view of the above mentioned, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is actually perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety times. Should the appeal isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she can then technique the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the ninety times with the department to act has already expired. About the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided with the decision from the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.
These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and consist of all notable cases decided from the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.
The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its primary purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more